James H. | Fairfax, VA | February 07, 2016
I chuckled for a minute after reading today's strip. Then I looked at it again, and I felt a bit sad. I wonder if Kim has wanted children of her own all these years, if she ever told Mike she wanted them to have kids, and, if she did, why it hasn't happened. If Doonesbury were publishing daily perhaps GBT would be exploring this storyline in-depth.
Patti H. | Rome, NY | February 07, 2016
Oh dear. With the 20-years-ago Flashback strip bringing us to the first meeting of Mike and Kim, today's "too late to fantasize about the future" is just too poignant!
Tom | San Francisco, CA | February 07, 2016
I wondered what became of the "pregnancy" story arc. At 40-something and 60-something (by my reckoning), biological children (who would be younger than their own nephews) might not be in the cards for Kim and Mike. But it's never too late (or too soon) to be a foster grandparent, a Big Brother / Big Sister, or a Court Appointed Special Advocate for children, or to foster a refugee child. As the children's story goes, "There's always room for one more!"
CLICK ON 'ENLARGE'
Linda | Gainesville, FL | February 04, 2016
I wish you would use bigger type for the wording in your comic strip. I am 60, and can no longer read your daily strip, because type is too small. I can read other comic strips without problem. I believe many of your followers are like me and have been reading your comic strip for years, and now we are aging and need larger type. Thank you.
Good news! Go to our home page -- Doonesbury.Washingtonpost.com -- and click on the red word ENLARGE, which appears just below the final panel of the strip. A considerably larger version of the strip will then pop up for your reading pleasure. Just click on the larger image to revert to the smaller one.
Rick Gordon | Highland Mills, NY | February 02, 2016
I find it more than ironic that the "dump" B.D. exclaims it's time Mike moved out of, is the same home in which B.D. and his family currently reside.
Perle O. | Baton Rouge, LA | February 02, 2016
I admit, I found myself resorting to the "donation in your name" for my nieblings, whose tastes in actual gifts I can no longer keep up with. I picked Kiva, the microloan charity, which reflected their volunteer interests. They get to pick which needy people to loan their gift donation to, and when it gets paid back, they will get to loan the same money over and over again, selecting the person each time.
John Ghalt | Anchorage, AK | February 01, 2016
I was pleased to see GBT plugging the "quaint" custom of old-school thank-you cards, right along with forgetting what Aunt Mary's gift actually was. I can't help but wonder which of his relatives (or friends) so polishes his halo. Another custom worthy of skewering is the annual self-aggrandizing "Christmas newsletter."
Bobfaser@hotmail.com | Hobart, AUSTRALIS | February 01, 2016
I wish to defend the use of charity donation cards as presents for Christmas (or other occasions). They work particularly nicely when combined with other smaller gifts. A $30 charity card plus a $5 lottery ticket plus either a CD/DVD/decent bottle of wine, makes a nice and substantial gift for many discerning adults. (And, besides, the smiling goat on the gift card gives a distinctive touch to the collection of various seasonal cards.)
Michael Mowle | Rochester Hills, MI | January 31, 2016
I'm not sure how to take today's strip. My family made the decision long ago to forgo the ludicrous consumerism that tarnishes the season and instead make charitable contributions for one another. (Except for the kids too young to understand). I, for one, think it is a beautiful thing and am puzzled by what appears to be a stand for consumerism, debt, and a lot of things I didn't think GBT stood for.
Neal | Concord, NH | January 31, 2016
I think the point of today's strip isn't that someone who makes a donation to a charity in lieu of a physical gift is bad, but that someone who makes a single (presumably tax deductible) donation to a charity of his choice, rather than the choice of the recipient, then takes credit for it among his friends and family, is probably doing it for less than altruistic reasons.
Allison Warfel | Gettysburg, PA | January 31, 2016
"Aunt Mary?" I wonder if Mike's brother Ben got hitched while we weren't looking.
Roberta Lyman | Raleigh, NC | January 31, 2016
Today's strip puzzles me. I wonder if Mr. Trudeau is suggesting that the person contributing to a charity in someone else's name is selfish, while the person who resents not receiving a physical gift instead is virtuous. Or this may be one of those Miss Manners things: It's better to be politely traditional than kind.
Steve Carlic | Syracuse, NHY | January 29, 2016
I thought Doonesbury readers might find this interesting; an article about GBT's contributions to the Saranac Lake Winter Carnival.
David Gibson | U.S. of A. | January 28, 2016
The recent Sunday strip about removing the Elias Walden statue seems especially appropriate for those of us in New York state reading about the village of Whitesboro trying to keep their town logo, which shows the founder apparently choking a Native American.
Chris | St. Augustine, FL | January 28, 2016
Ah, yesterday's ten-years-ago Flashback strip is a classic: Elias the VA counselor telling the story of losing his leg in a Harley accident, and the automatic reply, "Bike okay?" I had the pleasure of hearing GBT's model for Elias in an NPR interview 10 years ago. He'd lost his leg in 'Nam but told people it was on his Harley because he got more caring responses.
George | Tequesta, FL | January 26, 2016
Bless you for the Bach video this morning. We were in desperate need of a reminder of what the human race is capable of.
HAVING THE POWER
Jason Thorn | Phoenix, AZ | January 24, 2016
Lincoln once said, "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." It's a little scary to see how Zonker reacts to having the power that much money gives him, almost as much as how easily Duke will submit for the chance to get his hands on it.
DUKE AND HONEY
Neal Byles | Concord, NH | January 22, 2016
The series now running in the 40-years-ago section of Flashbacks: the first meeting of Duke and Honey, which sets the stage for four decades of the best dysfunctional relationship ever! "He also wishes your wife good health."
Geoff Chapman | Llandeilo, WALES | January 19, 2016
I'm 51, a UK resident, and have been following Doonesbury since I was 16. And I miss it, sooooo much. Don't get me wrong. I'm grateful for the Classics and the eight new panels every Sunday. But ever since the new dailies stopped I can't get away from the feeling a big piece of my heart and my mind got ripped away. I know you have Alpha House. But we can't get Alpha House in the UK, and even if we could I'm not sure we (I) would "get" it. I imagine it as like those more obscure (to UK residents) Doonesbury strips relating to senators and other figures we may not have heard of over here.
Regardless, my point is the loss I and many others over here feel at the hole left by no daily Doonesbury. Yesterday the Guardian, my UK paper of choice, printed six panels of Sunday's Doonesbury with a pledge to "keep publishing the strip." I hadn't yet seen that strip from the day before, and thought the daily was back, and with two panels extra. Joy unconfined. Crushed when I returned home to view the website and see it was actually Sunday's strip with the first two panels missing.
I'll carry on. Don't get me wrong. I know I have no right to ask for more. But it's such a loss from what some of us considered was a staple part of our lives that would last forever. Like Bowie. But bigger. And better. I hope Alpha House is a massive success. But not such a massive success that Doonesbury never returns. Thanks for everything you've brought to our lives. Enough approbation already.